Sunday, November 09, 2014

Interstellar Review: Space Tripping, Nolan style

So this is not going to be a conventional review.  I am going to be raging against a lot of other Interstellar review, and against the Marvel film franchise.  I am going to abuse my position as a late entrant reviewer to be a little non-objective here.

Little disclaimer:  I am more of a DC Comics guy, and all the Marvel characters that I do like, are either not with Marvel Studios, or they aren’t doing much with them.

But first let’s talk about Interstellar.  The trippy intellectual movie by Chris Nolan.  Trippy in some of its visuals and its dialogues.  In fact, I dare imagine, it would be a great movie to watch when high.  The discussions and arguments about the theories explored in the movie would play out much more interestingly if held among “stimulated” individuals.  But us, on our normal plane of thought and existence, we need to work for it. Nolan aims for something unique, mixing sci-fi visuals juxtaposed with high concept theories that make for some compelling arguments while stopping just short of proselytizing.

A lot of the reviews out there have been unfair to this movie.  Some overhyped the IMAX aspect during the prerelease and were disappointed when the movie failed to live up to their internal expectations.  They probably expected another bombastic, sci-fi adventure featuring a cowboy anti-hero and possibly lasers.  Lots of lasers.  Or perhaps they expected the high-concept aspect to be tempered and dumbed down into something as simple as time-travel or parallel dimensions.
The film’s third act conflict, is a human one, fitting in retrospect considering the earlier dialogue between McConnaughey’s Cooper and Hathaway’s Brand about the lack of evil to fear on their upcoming adventure.  Evil is essentially a trait unique to human nature.

But back to the expressed disappointment.  This is where I hate Marvel.  They have spoilt the movie going experience with their “Big, Inter-Connected Plan”.  The constant gratification provided to fanboys.  We need to go in knowing everything.  Who is Ultron? Does Hawkeye die?  Is Loki still in play? Will Star Lord throw down with Cap? 

You see it in the fanboy articles raving about every step, wink, nudge thrown at them by the Marvel machine.  They who turned on Christopher Nolan, for an ALLEGED remark made about Marvel post credit hooks.

We hate surprises now.  In an age where the entire final act is practically given away in the trailers, we tend to fill in the gaps when information is withheld and blame the movie for being unable to manage our expectations.

Interstellar is certainly not about gratification.  It is about making you think.  People will disagree with the conclusions drawn in the movie perhaps.  But that’s good.  Debate is good.  But I fear, the debate aspect will be skipped and we will move onto the generic humor and ridicule that bloggers are so prone to.

In my view, Interstellar aims really high.  It sets a bar and asks us to join it up there.  If you do feel disappointed, chances are you bought a Salman Rushdie novel expecting a Chetan Bhagat level of gratification.  Keep aiming Mr. Nolan.  I, for one, am with you.

P.S.
Marvel, with their phases extending right into the next millennium certainly has no plan to go gently into the good night.  Christopher Nolan, meanwhile, will be exploring his next unique endeavor, trying to outdo himself and setting expectations, not managing them.